As of late, there have been many articles flying around the Internet refering to the missing link being found. I’ve also just begun an Astronomy class at schol, which will be teaching current Evolutionary theory as fact. In addition, Bill Nye recently angered some parents who believe in God with comments about Genesis not being accurate as it refers to two lights (sun and moon) and stars , where the sun is just one of many stars and the moon is not a light at all.At this point, I’ve no idea how God would wish me to act upon these things. My current thought is to roll them off my shoulder, continually reading through scripture as well as science that supports Creation- not forgetting, of course, to keep up on current Evolutionary thought to understand what is observable, what is “guessing” and what is, in the end, truth.A comment made by an Instructor of mine seemed to declare that in the late 1900s, scientific thought and research had come so far that it disproved the existance of God and the human’s place in the Universe. To this, I can hardly contain myself. I make attempts to not turn anyone “off” to my views by not going over-the-top with my responses, or even keeping quiet, but I was thrown off my seat at the sound of this. Unfortunately for we that believe in something greater than chance (yes, believe), these scientific advances, these found “missing links”, these radioactive dates seem so right. Many athiests, agnostic and even Christians demand that we believers just accept what is right in front of us – we are worthless in a grandios Universe. A mere chance happening. Just one of the smallest (albiet lucky) lifeforms that occupies an infinitely minute space in all of Space.With those things in mind, the dating, the fossil records, the links, the demands, consider this:In March of 2005, a story was released (msnbc.com) telling of an odd discovery. Evolutionist Mary H. Schweitzer of North Carolina State University discovered some flexible blood vessels inside a fossilized thighbone of a Tyrannosaurus rex – supposedly 70 million years old in Eastern Montana. This tissue had never been seen before in fossilized dinosaurs – nor would Evolution allow it to be, as it should have broken down millions of years ago, whether buried in sandstone (as it was) or not. The questions this discovery brings up seem large enough, but why has this not been explored further? Why are many people so unaware of this, but are told of the found “missing link” so readily? Paleontologist Jack Horner said he hoped for other museums to crack open bones and try find tissue – but has this been done? I’ve heard nothing, but would certainly love to. In Evolutionary terms, this problem should not even exist, but as believers in Creation, we can know that the reason tissue that should have been gone just thousands of years after animal’s death is still here, is because the animal died just a few thousand years ago.Or consider just how Evolution works. As many know, science changes. New discoveries are made, theories are modified, thoughts change, it all needs to change to accomodate what we do not know. This seems to be useful for learning, but to say life evolved in a specific way seems impossible, as ideas change so often. So, when we are told to believe Evolution, we are being told to believe we were made through a way we have no way of surely knowing and no way to prove it. Some may say that you can prove it through observation, but who is to say that fossils are “in-between” evolutionary steps, or different animals all together? Must apes have evolved into something else, or is their chemcial and biological make-up sound enough to stay as it is? With no real way to prove these, and no sure way of knowing, belief in Evolution sounds a lot more like a faith, than a science.Lastly, there is one idea that as far as I am aware, is nearly never discussed among evolutionists and ignored when brought up in debate. That idea is origin. As believers in Creation, we know that God made us for himself out of love. But, where does Evolution stand? In my classes, my dicussions, my debates, an answer to this question has never even been attempted. Current Astrologists believe that our planets and star formed as a result of a “Big Bang,” which wasn’t the beginning of everything, but rather the collision of two ancient planets, which produced all the chemicals of our universe. If so, what made the planets that collided, how did they form, were they created through yet another “Big Bang?” Was there one original “Big Bang” that started it all – how did that happen? As far as I can tell, I am not sure I will ever hear an answer to this.With so many questions and discoveries surrounding the ever-evolving Evolutionary thought, how might one say the case is closed on where life, stars, planets, space and everything else came from? If anything, this battle rages more hotly the longer it burns, and it will until we all die and find out or Christ himself returns.